Does our brain use the same policy for interacting with people and manipulating different objects?
نویسنده
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Our first impression of other people is greatly affected by our previous experiences. Schematic processing, proposed in social psychology, explains our behavior in interacting with other people. It suggests existence of different schemas in our brain for different groups of people, e.g., extroverts, introverts, shy, women, men, etc. and also schemas related to special people like our parents, close friends, supervisor, and even ourselves. Each schema is recalled when we meet the corresponding person/personality (Atkinson, 1996). On the other hand there is a relatively well accepted theory–model based theoryin motor control and learning studies (Daw and Dayan, 2014; Dayan and Berridge, 2014). It suggests existence of some internal models (forward and/or inverse) in the brain which help us for planning and execution of the actions. Although these two viewpoints may seem very distinct, there are some interesting similarities between them, which are explained in the following section. I hypothesize that these correspondences may suggest that the brain employs same algorithms in dealing with both situations. Understanding the brain function is a great challenge for many scientists. Further evaluation of the proposed hypothesis may be helpful to achieve better understanding of the brain function, as advances in each field may encourage new ideas in the other one. In the following sections each of the two viewpoints and then their similarities are explained. STEREOTYPES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Stereotype is defined as “a fixed, often simplistic generalization about a particular group or class of people (Cardwell, 2014)”. Stereotypes, schemas, and schematic processing enable us to efficiently organize and process the huge volume of input information to our brain. Instead of processing every little detail about a new person, we can just recall the most similar schemas and generally categorize the person e.g., based on his most obvious physical features (Atkinson, 1996). Stereotypes enable us to respond rapidly in situations which we have had similar experience. Despite all the benefits, stereotypes may also result in prejudice. Since they bias our impressions, they can have very negative and even mortal (e.g., Amadou Diallo case) consequences (Atkinson, 1996).
منابع مشابه
Online multiple people tracking-by-detection in crowded scenes
Multiple people detection and tracking is a challenging task in real-world crowded scenes. In this paper, we have presented an online multiple people tracking-by-detection approach with a single camera. We have detected objects with deformable part models and a visual background extractor. In the tracking phase we have used a combination of support vector machine (SVM) person-specific classifie...
متن کاملDevelopment of the Alcohol Policy Document in Iran
Background: Statistics of alcohol use Iran was investigated in the beginning of 2010 in Mental, Social Health and Addiction Department of Ministry of Health. The findings showed that the alcohol use, especially in young people, is notable. Hence a strategic plan or a policy document in alcohol use was needed to explain the main vision also provide countrywide strategies for all related domains ...
متن کاملRe-imagining Research: A Bold Call, but Bold Enough?; Comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers in Canada: A Call to ‘Re-Imagine’ Research”
Many articles over the last two decades have enumerated barriers to and facilitators for evidence use in health systems. Bowen et al’s article “Response to Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers: A Call to ‘Re-imagine Research’” furthers the debate by focusing on an under-explored research area (health system design and health service organization) with ...
متن کاملL2 Vocabulary Learning and the Use of Reading Tasks: Manipulating the Involvement Load Index
As Schmidt (2008) states, deeper engagement with new vocabulary as induced by tasks clearly increases the chances of learning those words. This engagement is theoretically clarified by the involvement load hypothesis (ILH, Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001), based on which the involvement index of each task can be measured. The present study was designed to test ILH by evaluating the impact of 4 differ...
متن کاملL2 Vocabulary Learning and the Use of Reading Tasks: Manipulating the Involvement Load Index
As Schmidt (2008) states, deeper engagement with new vocabulary as induced by tasks clearly increases the chances of learning those words. This engagement is theoretically clarified by the involvement load hypothesis (ILH, Laufer and Hulstijn, 2001), based on which the involvement index of each task can be measured. The present study was designed to test ILH by evaluating the impact of 4 differ...
متن کامل